- Type
- Unglazed clay body
- Origin
- Yixing, Jiangsu — kilns at Shuzan & Teizan
- Firing
- Oxidation
- Arrived in Japan
- Mostly Shōwa onward
Clay colour · 泥色 · Yixing
Shudei
朱泥vermilion clay · unglazed
The warm red-brown of an unglazed Chinese pot. With shidei it is one of the two clays that most Chinese pots in Japan are made from, and the one people picture when they picture a Chinese bonsai pot at all.
Yixing is where the pots were gathered and sold, not where they were made. The kilns stood some twenty kilometres away around Shuzan and Teizan — today Dingshu, in Yixing county, Jiangsu. They were climbing kilns, half-buried tunnels running up a slope; the long ones linked dozens of chambers and approached a hundred metres, several times the scale of the largest kiln at Bizen. At their height, dozens of them were in smoke at once.
Age is the thing people most want from the colour, and it is the thing the colour gives least. Early imported shudei is scarce. Production for the Japanese market got going in earnest from the middle of the Meiji period, and it was not until the Shōwa era that shudei arrived in quantity. So a shudei pot is, on the balance of numbers, a twentieth-century pot — but no test separating one import period from the next is documented, and we do not invent one.
How to tell
- Red-brown, warm rather than bright. A pot in the vivid, almost scarlet register is more likely kōdei.
- Bright speckles across the surface make it nashiji-shudei 梨皮朱泥, “pear-skin”: refractory grit or grog in the body, the surface burnished before firing so the specks read as points of light.
- Fine and dense, or coarse and open. The finely levigated early clay is called neri-shudei; the coarser later body ara-shudei.
- A square one is a rarity. Square shudei pots are recorded as rare at any size.
Often confused with
Kōdei 紅泥, which is the same idea pushed towards crimson — and the line between them is a judgement, not a rule. More fundamentally, shidei: whether the two are one clay fired differently or two different clays is genuinely unsettled. The modern account says one zisha body, reduced for shidei and oxidised for shudei; older texts record them as separate earths. The question is not settled, and it is not settled here either.